This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Haveman, M.J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Haveman, M.J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Clinical Judgement On Alternative Care for Longstay Patients in Dutch Mental Hospitals

How many longstay patients could be equally served by less sheltered facilities, and what are the main reasons for staff members to judge patients suitable for such alternative care? These were two questions in a Dutch study (1984-1985) of five mental hospitals. The attending psychiatrists in these hospitals and members of the nursing staff, were asked to give an independent judgement for each of a random sample of 381 longstay patients.

Thirty percent of the longstay patients were judged eligible for alternative care. They were generally younger, less frequently diagnosed as schizophrenic, better integrated both inside and outside the mental hospital, more likely to be resident of wards with high turnover rates, were less aggressive, had better social skills, and had shorter periods of inpatient stay. Compared with the rest of the patients no statistically significant differences were found with regard to suicidal behaviour, organic brain syndrome and formal admission status.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M.J. Haveman and M.A. Maaskant Psychiatric Foster Care for Adult Patients: Results of a Study in the Netherlands International Journal of Social Psychiatry, March 1, 1990; 36(1): 58 - 67. [Abstract] [PDF]