Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burns, T.
Right arrow Articles by Audini, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burns, T.
Right arrow Articles by Audini, B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Schizophrenia
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Delphi Approach To Characterising 'Relapse' as Used in Uk Clinical Practice

Tom Burns

Department of Psychiatry, St. George's Hospital Medical School, Jenner Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 ORE

Matthew Fiander

Department of Psychiatry, St. George's Hospital Medical School, Jenner Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 ORE

Bernard Audini

Research Unit, The Royal College of Psychiatrists, 17 Belgrave Square, London SW1X 8PG

Background: 'Relapse' is a common outcome indicator in intervention studies in schizophrenia. In community studies it is froqucntly equated with hospitalisation and in psychopharmacological studies with predetermined symptom scores. Its clinical meaning, however, remains undefined.

Method: Consensus on the defining features of 'relapse' in schizophrenia used by academic and clinical schizophrenia experts in the UK, was investigated using a four stage Delphi process. A two panel, four stage, Delphi based methodology was used to investigate the implicit meanings of 'relapse' in clinical practice. A multi disciplinary panel of twelve members each listed anonymously ten indicators of relapse. A second panel, of ten experienced psychiatrists, rated the 188 submitted indicators from essential-unimportant (1-5). This panel completed a one day workshop during the remaining Delphi rounds ending with a structured discussion of the results.

Results: Very strong consensus was achieved on the relative importance of potential relapse indicators. There was complete agreement about some aspects of a definition of relapse (such as recurrence of positive symptoms) and a number of the complex issues underlying the concept were clearly articulated. Conclusions: This four stage Delphi process achieved consensus on core features of relapse. The elucidation of the "softer" features at the threshold between normal fluctuations in functioning and the start of relapse require continuing investigations.

International Journal of Social Psychiatry, Vol. 46, No. 3, 220-230 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/002076400004600308


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
A. P. Morrison and S. Barratt
What Are the Components of CBT for Psychosis? A Delphi Study
Schizophr Bull, October 30, 2009; (2009) sbp118v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
D. Addington, E. McKenzie, J. Addington, S. Patten, H. Smith, and C. Adair
Performance Measures for Early Psychosis Treatment Services
Psychiatr Serv, December 1, 2005; 56(12): 1570 - 1582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]