Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, L. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Mental Health Act Assessments: Does a Community Treatment Team Make a Difference?

Louise M. Dunn

There is an extensive body of research into home treatment for acute mental illness, but this is the first one to examine any association with Mental Health Act Assessments. It examines the question of whether there is any impact of a home treatment team on the numbers and circumstances of Mental Health Act Assess ments in its area. The 1983 Mental Health Act created the role of the Approved Social Worker, among whose duties is that of ensuring that any disposal is the least restrictive possible. For this duty to be carried out meaningfully, as wide a range of alternatives as possible needs to be available. The move from institutional to community care for the mentally ill which has been the 'big idea' of recent decades has given rise to intense interest in home treatment for acute mental illness, which can offer a potential alternative at a time of crisis for ASWs and thus patients.

This study examined over 200 reports written by ASWs following Mental Health Act Assessments in the two areas, and it was found that the home treatment team appeared to have an impact. it was hypothesised that such a team might have an effect on the sorts people presenting for assessment. It was conduded that area with the team had an absolute and a relative reduction in the numbers of assessments. It was also found that there was a decrease in the likelihood of detention under Section 3 of the Act for people living in the area of the team. Finally it was found that the involvement of the team in an assessment reduced the likelihood of a Section 3 decision even further. Analysis indicated that the home treatment team was able to absorb some of the people, mainly male, who were suffering from a psychotic illness, and who were inclined to re-present on more than one occasion.

International Journal of Social Psychiatry, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1-19 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/002076400104700201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Soc PsychiatryHome page
L. Magliano, A. Fiorillo, H. Del Vecchio, C. Malangone, C. De Rosa, C. Bachelet, G. Cesari, R. D'Ambrogio, F. Fulgosi Cigala, F. Veltro, et al.
Development and Validation of a Self-Reported Questionnaire On Users' Opinions About Schizophrenia: a Participatory Research
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, September 1, 2009; 55(5): 425 - 441.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
E. Furminger and M. Webber
The Effect of Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment on Assessments under the 1983 Mental Health Act: An Increased Workload for Approved Social Workers?
Br. J. Soc. Work, July 1, 2009; 39(5): 901 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. J. Crawford, K. Price, D. Rutter, P. Moran, P. Tyrer, A. Bateman, P. Fonagy, S. Gibson, and T. Weaver
Dedicated community-based services for adults with personality disorder: Delphi study
The British Journal of Psychiatry, October 1, 2008; 193(4): 342 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Soc PsychiatryHome page
N. Aggarwal
Editorial: Farmer Suicides in India: The Role of Psychiatry and Anthropology
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, July 1, 2008; 54(4): 291 - 292.
[PDF]


Home page
Int J Soc PsychiatryHome page
B. Hubner-Liebermann, H. Spiessl, K. Iwai, and C. Cording
Treatment of Schizophrenia: Implications Derived from an Intercultural Hospital Comparison between Germany and Japan
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, March 1, 2005; 51(1): 83 - 96.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Soc PsychiatryHome page
A. Maercker
Editorial: The Study of Values: An Unconventional Approach to Cross-Cultural and Social Psychiatry
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, June 1, 2004; 50(2): 99 - 101.
[PDF]


Home page
Int J Soc PsychiatryHome page
P.-O. Trosell
Differences between Indigenous Samis and Norwegians in Mental Disorders and Background Factors: Patients Listed as Under Treatment at the DPS-Lakselv (County District Psychiatric Centre), Finnmark, Spring 2000
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, June 1, 2004; 50(2): 163 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
D. BHUGRA and A. MASTROGIANNI
Globalisation and mental disorders: Overview with relation to depression
The British Journal of Psychiatry, January 1, 2004; 184(1): 10 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]