This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Watson, A. C. Articles by Corrigan, P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Watson, A. C. Articles by Corrigan, P. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

From Whence Comes Mental Illness Stigma?

University of Chicago Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, IL, USA

Victor Ottati, PhD

Loyola University, Chicago, IL, USA

Patrick Corrigan, PsyD

University of Chicago Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 7230 Arbor Drive, Tinley Park, IL 60477, USA. p-corrigan{at}uchicago.edu

Background: This paper seeks to answer two fundamental questions: What is the basis of the current form of mental illness stigma? and Why do western cultures stereotype people with mental illness as dangerous, incompetent and blameful, rather than something else?

Material and discussion: We argue that a motivational model called system-justification offers several benefits for answering these questions. System-justification portrays stigma as a way of making sense of economic and political differences between the majority and stigmatized subgroups. We contrast system-justification with two cognitive models of stigma that seem to have strong support from naïve psychology: mental illness stigma results as the normal perception of a group of people who are dangerous and/or blameworthy and there is a kernel of truth to the stigmatizing attitudes about people with mental illness. Although research supporting the latter two models is mixed, there are significant limitations to the models, as well as concerns that normal perception and kernel of truth might actually promote stigma.

Conclusions: As an alternative, system-justification combines three paradigms that suggest its worthiness for future research: 1) a review of historical and economic forces that influence social phenomena; 2) the need of humankind to understand these forces and organize them into a unitary framework; and 3) the cognitive mechanisms that are essential for this comprehension. Implications of this model for stigma change are discussed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. I. Ping Tsao, A. Tummala, and L. W. Roberts Stigma in Mental Health Care Acad Psychiatry, April 1, 2008; 32(2): 70 - 72. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Lauber, C. Nordt, H. Haker, L. Falcato, and W. Rossler Community psychiatry: results of a public opinion survey. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, May 1, 2006; 52(3): 234 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. S. Bromley and S. J. Cunningham 'You don't bring me flowers any more': an investigation into the experience of stigma by psychiatric in-patients Psychiatr. Bull., October 1, 2004; 28(10): 371 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]