This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Frost-Gaskin, M. Articles by Pacitti, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Frost-Gaskin, M. Articles by Pacitti, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Welfare Benefits Outreach Project to Users of Community Mental Health Services

MIND in Croydon, 26 Pampisford Road, Croydon, Surrey CR8 2NE, UK

Rory O'Kelly

MIND in Croydon, 26 Pampisford Road, Croydon, Surrey CR8 2NE, UK

Claire Henderson

Health Services Research Department, David Goldberg Building, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK, hendersc{at}nypdrat.cpmc.columbia.edu

Richard Pacitti

MIND in Croydon, 26 Pampisford Road, Croydon, Surrey CR8 2NE, UK

Background: Many psychiatric service users are entitled to welfare benefits, but work from the UK and the USA suggests many are either unaware of their entitlements or find the benefits system difficult to access.

Aims: This study has four aims: 1) to assess the extent to which people using a range of community mental health services receive the welfare benefits to which they are entitled; 2) to calculate the impact on income of receiving help from specialist benefits advisors; 3) to ascertain sociodemographic risk factors for under-claiming; and 4) to identify reasons for under-claiming related to the claims system itself, in order to make recommendations for routine practice.

Methods: This report makes use of data collected during a welfare benefit uptake project by Mind in Croydon staff (MF-G, RO, RP). Benefit assessments were offered to a total of 153 people attending any Croydon resource centre (run by the Health Service) other than the pilot site, or day centre (run by Social Services) for people with mental health problems. All those who were identified as under-claiming were offered help pursuing claims through to conclusion. We used quantitative methods to address the first three aims; qualitative methods in the form of case studies were used to address the fourth.

Results: One-third (34%) of people seen were getting their correct entitlement and two-thirds (66%) were under-claiming. All those found to be under-claiming who accepted all the help offered (87 out of 99 underclaimants) did gain additional benefits as a result, of a mean annual amount of £3079 each. Under-claiming was more frequent in those under 65 years of age, but having had previous advice or having a care manager did not protect against under-claiming. A number of reasons for under-claiming were identified.

Conclusions: For a large and possibly increasing proportion of people using community mental health services, the current benefits system necessitates frequent advice and help by expert advisers to avoid poverty due to under-claiming. The adverse effects on quality of life and mental health may be significant, as are the economic implications of correcting this level of under-claiming.

International Journal of Social Psychiatry, Vol. 49, No. 4, 251-263 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0020764003494003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Lauber, C. Nordt, H. Haker, L. Falcato, and W. Rossler Community Psychiatry: Results of a Public Opinion Survey International Journal of Social Psychiatry, May 1, 2006; 52(3): 234 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]