This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McCabe, R. Articles by Priebe, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by McCabe, R. Articles by Priebe, S. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Therapeutic Relationship in the Treatment of Severe Mental Illness: A Review of Methods and Findings

Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Newham Centre for Mental Health, London, E13 8SP, UK.r.mccabe{at}qmul.ac.uk

Stefan Priebe

Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Newham Centre for Mental Health, UK.

Aims: To review the methods and findings from studies of the therapeutic relationship (TR) in the treatment of severe mental illness.

Method: A literature search was conducted to identify all studies that used an operationalised measurement of the TR in the treatment of severe mental illness. Results: Fifteen scales–the majority of which were developed for psychotherapy–and the expressed emotion index have been used. Most scales have acceptable internal, inter-rater and test–retest reliability. As none of the scales has been used in more than five studies, no single scale is widely established in psychiatric research. A more positive relationship consistently predicts a better short-and long-term outcome. It appears that a large global factor accounts for the greatest proportion of the variance in the therapeutic relationship.

Conclusions: The therapeutic relationship is a reliable predictor of patient outcome in mainstream psychiatric care. Valid assessments may need to take account of different, specific aspects of the relationship in psychiatric settings such as greater heterogeneity of treatment components and goals, increased variability of setting and the statutory responsibility of the clinician. Methodological progress may require conceptual work to ensure valid assessments of this central element of treatment.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. McCabe, M. Saidi, and S. Priebe Patient-reported outcomes in schizophrenia The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2007; 191(50): s21 - s28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Chaplin, P. Lelliott, A. Quirk, and C. Seale Negotiating styles adopted by consultant psychiatrists when prescribing antipsychotics Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., January 1, 2007; 13(1): 43 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Kirsh and E. Tate Developing a comprehensive understanding of the working alliance in community mental health. Qual Health Res, October 1, 2006; 16(8): 1054 - 1074. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Sells, L. Davidson, C. Jewell, P. Falzer, and M. Rowe The Treatment Relationship in Peer-Based and Regular Case Management for Clients With Severe Mental Illness Psychiatr Serv, August 1, 2006; 57(8): 1179 - 1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Bale, J. Catty, H. Watt, N. Greenwood, and T. Burns Measures of the therapeutic relationship in severe psychotic illness: a comparison of two scales. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, May 1, 2006; 52(3): 256 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF]