This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lawn, S. Articles by Urukalo, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lawn, S. Articles by Urukalo, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Mental Health Expert Patient: Findings from a Pilot Study of a Generic Chronic Condition Self-Management Programme for People with Mental Illness

Flinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit, Room 4T306, Margaret Tobin Centre, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia. Sharon.lawn{at}flinders.edu.au

Malcolm W. Battersby

Rene G. Pols

Flinders University Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia

John Lawrence

Flinders Human Behaviour and Health Research Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia

Trevor Parry

Division of Mental Health/Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia

Mick Urukalo

Department of Health, South Australia

Background: Less than optimal outcomes and escalating costs for chronic conditions including mental illness have prompted calls for innovative approaches to chronic illness management.

Aims: This study aimed to test the feasibility and utility of combining a generic, clinician administered and peer-led self-management group approach for people with serious mental illness.

Method: General practitioners and mental health case managers used a patient centred care model (the Flinders model) to assist 38 patients with serious mental illness to identify their self-management needs, and match these with interventions including Stanford peer-led, self-management groups and one-to-one peer support. Self-management and quality of life outcomes were measured and qualitative evaluation elicited feedback from all participants.

Results: Collaborative care planning, combined with a problems and goals focused approach, resulted in improved self-management and mental functioning at 3 to 6 months follow-up. The Stanford self-management course was applicable and acceptable to patients with serious mental illnesses. Qualitative feedback was highly supportive of this approach.

Conclusions: Generic, structured assessment and care planning approaches, resulting in self-management education targeted to the individual, improved self-management and quality of life. Patients and service providers reported considerable gains despite the challenges associated with introducing a generic model within the mental health and general practice sector.

International Journal of Social Psychiatry, Vol. 53, No. 1, 63-74 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0020764007075010


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?